Tuesday, 22 May 2012

Three Virtues

How do faith, hope and love and the nine types of fruit (see Archive) join up? How do they work together, as Paul clearly thinks they do? What Paul does, again and again, is to give initial guidelines, especially in areas where the outworking of Christian virtue will lead people into behaviour patters that will look surprising to them, and perhaps shocking to their neighbours. They will need to be reassured that this is indeed the way to go. Instructions that could look like simple old "rules" are, for the most part, guidelines to keep them on track while they are learning the habits of the heart. He is not lapsing back toward a rules-based ethic purporting to advocate a virtue-based one.

Paul is no doubt well aware that however much he may want the virtues and the fruit to be chosen, developed, and put into practice by every single Christian and by the church as a whole, there are going to be many cases where one cannot simply wait for that to happen. One cannot, in the meantime, leave people with no guidelines as to where the virtues ought to be leading, any more than you can leave new converts without clear indications of which styles of behaviour will in fact cohere with "being in Christ" and which won't. We note that Paul is engaged in active pastoral ministry.

Stepping in with some firm "rules," as (for instance) in 1 Corinthians 5 and 6, does not mean that he has given up inculcating virtue and is going back to rules, let alone to "the Law" itself. Rather, he is displaying the skill of the pastor: knowing when to let the young pupil learn from mistakes made, and when to push the theory toward the back burner and go to the rescue. Rules and virtue go together. We can see, on a broad canvas, the truth which Paul highlights in Romans 8.3: what the Law could not do ... God has done. See 1 Thessalonians 1.3, 5.8; Colossians 1.4-5.

We are daytime people, even though the world sleeps on! As in 1 Corinthians, then, the three virtues are to be found in an eschatological context. These are the things which belong to the new day that is dawning, and which you must make every effort to put on in the present time. It may be clear that love is a virtue, in the sense of being an aspect of present hard-won discipleship which genuinely anticipates the central feature of the life of the coming age; but how does this apply to faith and hope?

See 1 Corinthians 13. These three abide. They will last into the future world. Faith and hope will not vanish or be emptied. Why not?

It is true that faith and hope do at present seem to us to be looking forward to the new age, so that we might assume that when that new age comes they will be redundant. But Paul is seeing much deeper that that. Faith is the settled, unwavering trust in the one true God whom we have come to know in Jesus Christ. When we see him face to face we shall not abandon that trust, but deepen it. Hope is the settled, unwavering confidence that this God will not leave us or forsake us, but will always have more in store for us than we could ask or think.

I believe that the God we know in Jesus is the God of utterly generous, outflowing love, I believe that there will be no end to the new creation of this God, and that within the new age itself there will always be more to hope for, more to work for, more to celebrate. Learning to hope in the present time is learning not just to hope for a better place than we currently find ourselves in, but learning to trust the God who is and will remain the God of the future.

To speak of "virtue" is indeed to say that we are concerned with the moral growth, the habits of the heart, of every single individual. But to insist that the three primary virtues, are faith, hope, and above all love is to insist that to grow in these virtues is precisely to grow in looking away from oneself and toward God on the one hand and one's neighbour on the other. The more you cultivate these virtues, the less you will be thinking about yourself at all.

Of course morality must take root deep within the individual. To insist on that, as virtue does, is to insist that it is neither an externally imposed rule, nor a calculation of consequences that could in principle have been done by a computer, nor a matter of discovering what is in the depth of one's heart and being true to it. But if "morality" ends up coming to its focal point in faith, hope, and love, then - though it will spring from deep within - its actual focal point is outside the self and in the God and the neighbour who are being loved, in the God who is the object of faith and hope and the neighbour who is to be seen, and loved, in the light of that faith and that hope.

All three, themselves gifts from God, point away from ourselves and outward: faith, toward God and his action in Jesus Christ; hope, toward God's future; love, toward both God and our neighbour. "Those who belong to the Messiah Jesus crucified the flesh": there are no exceptions, no categories of people who can, as it were, slide sideways into the holiness which the gospel generates without going the painful route of crucifixion with the Messiah and then the hard moral effort needed to cultivate the virtues in all their fullness.

The point of using the term "fruit," after all, is that these are things which grow from within rather than being imposed from without. The different varieties of fruit are, like the virtues, characteristics that need to be thought through, chosen with an act of mind and will, and implemented with determination even when the emotions may be suggesting something quite different. That is how you are recreated as a fully human being, reflecting God's image. That is how you become, in advance, part of the "royal priesthood."

Morality, surprisingly to some, is part of a mission. Cleansed vessels are to be put to fresh use; conversely, fresh use requires cleaning. Paul insists that the church must be, must think of itself as, and must make every effort to remain, one body, a corporate virtue where all other virtues come together.

-From After You Believe by N.T. Wright, paraphrased pages 198-206

Friday, 30 March 2012

The Difference Between Reconciliation and Redemption

God, the King, reconciles His enemy unto Himself through the intercession and mediation of His Son. God, the Redeemer, purchases the slave of sin from the market place with the redemptive blood of His Son and sets the slave free.

Reconciliation

Sinners are enemies of God. They live in opposition to God's government. Man, in sin, asserts self in active hostility and antagonism to the Ruler of the universe. Self and God move in opposite directions. "When we were enemies, we were reconciled to God by the death of his Son" (Rom. 5:10). "Because the carnal mind is enmity against God: for it is not subject to the law of God, neither indeed can be. So then they that are in the flesh cannot please God" (Rom. 8:7, 8). "And you, that were sometime alienated and enemies in your mind by wicked works, yet now hath he reconciled" (Col. 1:21).

"Know ye not that the friendship of the world is enmity with God? Whosoever therefore will be a friend of the world is the enemy of God" (Jas. 4:4). Reconciliation originates in God's grace. God has taken the initiative in removing the enmity and establishing peace between Himself and men. (Rom. 5:1, 2.) Christ's sacrifice provided the basis of reconciliation of God, the King of the universe, and His enemies. God is propitiated; sinners are reconciled. Sinners have peace with God through the Lord Jesus Christ.

Being reconciled, the believer lives in submission to God's rulership. He has peace with God (Rom. 5:1; Eph. 2:17), access to God (Rom. 5:2; Eph. 2:18; John 14:6), and unity with other Christians, whether Jew or Gentile, in one body (Eph. 2:14). Peace with God refers to the sinner's reconciliation; peace of God (Phil. 4:7) refers to the believer's inner calm and poise, a fruit of the Spirit; peace among nations refers to Christ's future Kingdom (Micah 4:3).

Redemption

Redemption is liberation of a slave from bondage by payment of a price. Sinners are slaves to sin. "Whosoever committeth sin is the servant of sin" (John 8:34), "Of whom a man is overcome, of the same is he brought in bondage" (2 Pet. 2:9). "Know ye not, that to whom ye yield ourselves servants to obey, his servants ye are to whom ye obey; whether of sin unto death, or of obedience unto righteousness?" (Rom. 6:6, 12-22.) Sinners need redemption. They cannot redeem themselves; redemption must come from Another.

Redemption originates in God's grace and is based upon Christ's sacrifice. God, the Redeemer, performs His work of redemption through Jesus, the Redeemer. The scene is the agora, the market place. Slaves of sin are in bondage, "sold under sin" (Rom. 7:14). God, the Redeemer, purchases slaves of sin in the market place with the precious blood of His Son, who voluntarily gave His life as a ransom price for sinners. Having paid the purchase price, the Redeemer removes the redeemed from the market place. The Redeemer, then, sets the prisoners free; they are given perfect freedom. Out of appreciation and love for the Redeemer, the redeemed give themselves to Him as His servants. (1 Pet. 2:16.)

In forgiveness, God is Creditor; in justification, He is Judge; in reconciliation, He is King; in redemption, He is Redeemer. Christians have been liberated from sin's bondage that they might become servants of God. One finds life's greatest freedom when he obeys Christ as Lord. To be a servant of God and His Son is life's greatest privilege. To live in obedience to such a glorious Lord is to find life at its best.

Make me a captive, Lord,
   And then I shall be free;
Force me to render up my sword,
   And I shall conqueror be.
I sink in life's alarms
   When by myself I stand;
Imprison me within Thine arms,
   And strong shall be my hand.
                                 -George Matheson

Redemption is threefold. Believers experience redemption by blood, by power, and by future resurrection. In redemption by Christ's blood, they are redeemed from the penalty of sin. In redemption by Christ's power, the Holy Spirit. they are redeemed from the power of sin. In redemption by future resurrection, believers will be redeemed from the presence of sin. When resurrected to immortality, they will have experienced complete redemption. That future event is described as the day of redemption. (Eph. 4:30; 1:13, 14;Luke 21:28; Rom. 8:23.)

-From Systematic Theology by Alva G. Huffer.

Thursday, 1 March 2012

Man's Fourfold Predicament

Man in his mortal and sinful condition is unsuited for God's perfect eternity. In physical nature, man is mortal. In position before God, he is a sinner. In his character or inward nature, he is sinful; he is governed by self or the carnal mind. In conduct or actions, he sins. Man must experience four changed:

1. Future Physical Change

Man needs a physical transformation from mortality to immortality. "Flesh and blood cannot inherit the kingdom of God; neither doth corruption inherit incorruption" (1 Cor. 15:50). Corruption cannot inherit incorruption. "This corruptible must put on incorruption, and this mortal must put on immortality" (1 Cor. 15:50). Man's physical nature must be changed.

The believer's change to immortality will occur when Jesus returns. At Christ's second coming, the church will be glorified. Christians who have fallen asleep in death will be resurrected to immortality. Christians who are living at the time of His return will be changed into immortality and will be glorified with the resurrected saints.

1 Thess. 4:16, 17 presents the fact of Christ's return and the resurrection. "The Lord himself shall descend from heaven with a shout, with the voice of the archangel, and with the trump of God; and the dead in Christ shall rise first: then we which are alive and remain shall be caught up together with them in the clouds, to meet the Lord in the air: and so shall we ever be with the Lord."

1 Cor. 15:51-53 presents the nature of the resurrection. "Behold, I shew you a mystery; We shall not all sleep, but we shall all be changed, in a moment, in the twinkling of an eye, at the last trump: for the trumpet shall sound, and the ead shall be raised incorruptible, and we shall be changed. For this corruptible must put on incorruption, and this mortal must put on immortality."

The Christian's physical change from mortality to immortality will not occur until the resurrection when Jesus comes. There is no way in which a person can experience this physical change before that future event. Every true believer will experience physical transformation at the same time when Jesus comes.

To be continued...

Thursday, 16 February 2012

Setting the Scene for Jesus' Revolution

What are Jesus' parables all about? The simple answer to that question is that they are all describing some aspect of the 'kingdom of God'. The 'kingdom of God' was the central theme of Jesus' preaching and indeed of his whole ministry, and the parables should all be seen and understood in that context. The word 'kingdom' itself has different connotations now from those it had in Jesus' day: whereas the word 'kingdom' often suggests a place to us, Jesus used the term in a broader sense to refer to a state of affairs - to God ruling as king - as well as to the realm where God rules.

'Kingship' was then something very contemporary and very powerful. So when Jesus announced the coming of God's kingdom or kingly rule, he was not explaining an interesting theological theory; rather he was claiming that something of enormous importance and practical relevance was taking place, of which people needed to take urgent account.

He was in fact announcing God's final intervention in history. The Old Testament prophets looked forward to the time when God would impose his kingly rule on the world. They believed that in one sense God had always ruled the world from the time of creation, and so the psalmists joyfully exclaim 'The Lord reigns' (e.g. Ps 93:1, 96:10); and yet at the same time it was quite evident that God was not exerting his rule in a total sense: the sin and suffering and oppression that were such a painful reality in the Old Testament world, not least among God's chosen people of Israel (to whom he had made great promises), were the rebellion against God's kingly rule. So the Old Testament prophets looked forward to a future time when God would intervene, put things right and rule - so Zechariah 14:9, 'The Lord will be king over the whole earth.'

The Old Testament looks forward to that time in many different ways, speaking sometimes of the restoration of the people of Israel to greatness, and of the coming of a new king like the great Old Testament king David, and sometimes more broadly of God healing the sicknesses and enmities and hatreds of the world. Isaiah 11:6-9, for example, speaks of the coming of a 'shoot from the stump of Jesse' (i.e. of a new Spirit-filled king from the family of David), and then of restored harmony in nature. Other passages speak of God's people being freed from foreign oppression, of renewed prosperity and of justice for the poor, of war and weapons of war being abolished, of death being swallowed up and tears wiped away, of the estrangement between God and mankind being removed, of God's Spirit being poured out in a new way, and so on. (Some notable passages are Isa 2, 25, 61; Jer 31; Dan 7, 12; Mic 4; Joel 2.)

Today we might describe the Old Testament hope as a hope for a divine 'revolution'. The Old Testament prophets looked forward to a cosmic revolution with the whole world being at peace again with God and under his kingly control. Jesus announced the coming of this greater revolution. When he told people that 'The time is fulfilled; the Kingdom of God has come near' (Mk 1:15), he was saying, in effect, 'The longed-for revolution is now under way.' He was announcing a dramatic, forceful change in society to people who - unlike many in our complacent modern world - really longed for such a change: God was at last intervening to put things right. God's revolution was to be a total revolution overthrowing Satan and evil and bringing earth and heaven back into harmony, and this would not be accomplished by force of arms, but - unbelievably so far as the disciples were concerned, and who blames them? - through suffering and death.

The phrase 'kingdom of heaven' is just an alternative way of saying 'kingdom of God'. The kingdom which Jesus proclaimed was not just up in heaven; it was more like an invasion of earth by heaven!

 Jesus' extraordinary miracles were evidence of this. He explained them as a fulfillment of the Old Testament promises and as tangible evidence of the overthrow of Satan's evil empire: so when John the Baptist had doubts about Jesus, Jesus said to John's disciples, 'Go back and report to John what you hear and see: The blind receive sight, the lame walk, those who have leprosy are cured, the deaf hear, the dead are raised' - a revolution indeed, and a fulfillment of Old Testament passages such as Isaiah 35:5-6; 61:1 (see Mt 11:2-6; Lk 7:18-23).

Jesus' revolution affected not only people's diseases, but also their relationships with each other: Jesus broke through social barriers, bringing together Jew and Samaritan, man and woman, rich and poor. It was no accident that on meeting with Jesus the rich Zacchaeus gave half his goods to the poor (Lk 19:8), because God's revolutionary rule is not something affecting only people's minds or their relationships with God, but also their life in society and their relationships with each other. The revolution of God entails the establishment of a revolutionary society. Indeed the word 'kingdom', when used by Jesus, often suggests not just the process of revolution, but also the new world and society that God is bringing.

God's new society includes God - not surprisingly! Thus Jesus proclaimed forgiveness to sinners, thereby bringing people out of darkness of Satan's rule into the light of God's favour and into the experience of God as 'Abba', Father. 'Abba' was a revolutionary word used by children to address their father - a little like 'Daddy' in English, though without the juvenile feel that the English word often has. Jews did not ordinarily address their holy God with this word; but Jesus brought a revolution, expressing his own close relationship with God through this word and inviting his followers to do so too (see Mk 14:36; Lk 11:2; Jn 17:1-26; Rom 8:15; Gal 4:6, etc.)

To announce the coming of a revolution is calculated to stir people up. The question on many lips is: What's involved in joining the revolution, and what must I do t get into the new society ('to enter the kingdom')? Jesus' announcement of the kingdom, of God's revolution, had an effect: some responded enthusiastically, others did their best to suppress the revolution. Few revolutions are established overnight; there is often a long and fierce struggle with drawn-out resistance from 'reactionary' elements. Jesus' revolution was no exception, nor did he suppose that it would be. He, in his ministry, death and resurrection, established a decisive bridgehead in the occupied territory; but it would be a long struggle with many casualties before Satan was completely ousted and God's legitimate rule restored. Jesus taught his followers to look forward to his return at the end of time, when he would bring the revolution to completion and when God's new world and society would be finally and fully established. In the meantime he called his followers to live for the revolution and in the spirit (or rather 'Spirit') of the revolution, and to keep alive their confident expectation of the final liberation and victory.

To sum up: in proclaiming the kingdom of God, Jesus was announcing the coming of God's revolution and of God's new world, as promised in the Old Testament. God was at last intervening, Jesus declared, to establish his reign over everything, to being salvation to his people and renewal and reconciliation to the world. The study of the parables themselves will in turn fill out and clarify our understanding of the kingdom.

-Parts taken from The Parables of Jesus by David Wenham.

Wednesday, 8 February 2012

Kingdom Phraseology

We want to show that the language of the Apostles confirmed the Jews in their Messianic hopes of the Kingdom. This is seen (1) from their employing the Jewish phraseology used to designate the Messianic times; (2) from their applying these to the future advent of Jesus, and urging their hearers to expect that such a Coming will fulfill the prophets; (3) from the fact that the Christianized Jews, in their respective congregations, held both to this Second Advent (having received Jesus as the Messiah), and to the restoration of the Davidic throne and kingdom at the second appearing of Jesus.

It is corroborated by the church history of the earliest period, informing us, without any dissent, that, so far as known, all the Jewish believers held precisely the aforementioned views. How does it come that under the direct, personal preaching of the apostles such views of the Kingdom were entertained, unless it resulted from the manner of teaching? Instead of contradicting the Jewish views of the people, the apostles use the very words and phrases most eminently calculated to confirm the Jewish belief. This is seen in employing, as e.g. "the times of restitution," "the world to come," "redemption,"salvation," "the age to come," "the day of the Lord," "the day of Christ," etc., and without any indicated change of meaning apply to them to the Second Advent of Jesus, who is the Messiah. This application naturally and logically led the Jewish believers to fix their fond expectations of the Kingdom upon the Second Coming, and not on the First. They only legitimately followed the divine teaching of Jesus, who declared that His Kingdom was postponed to the time of His Coming again. It is the identical faith, enforced by covenant and prophecy, by the preaching of John, Jesus, disciples, and apostles, which, above all others, we should find in the primitive church.

Many writers have noticed this peculiar usage of Jewish phraseology and that the phrases "end of the age," "last days," "last times," etc., were regarded by the Jews as the period just previous to and immediate to the establishment of the Messianic Kingdom. The apostles continue their use, referring them to the still future, including this dispensation, so that in their estimation these times could not possibly include an existing covenanted Kingdom, as e.g. in Heb. 1:2 etc. Redemption was always united in the Jewish mind with the coming and Kingdom of the Messiah, and so it continued, and the Second Advent itself, in view of the results, is called "our Redemption."

After such appeals as Paul makes (Acts 26:6, 7, 80 to the Jewish hope; after linking the Jewish "Rest" with the Coming Messiah; after uniting the Jewish view of Judgeship and Judgment with the Second Advent of Jesus; after making the Millennial glory dependent upon the future Advent; after joining the restoration of the Jewish nation with Christ's return; after endorsing and enforcing the Jewish first resurrection as preceding the glorious Messianic times; after all these, and similar points of union, it is difficult to see how men and women with Jewish views, holding tenaciously to covenant and prophecy, could possibly understand the apostles in any other sense than a Jewish one. let the reader consider that this agreement is found not merely in one or two things but runs through a great variety, even embracing all the distinguishing peculiarities of a restored Davidic throne and Kingdom under the Messiah.

We hold that the resurrection of Christ is preparatory, qualifying the Son of man for that predicted rule; and to prove that His Theocratic reign, as covenanted, does not immediately follow the resurrection and ascension (however exalted David's Son may be), but is connected with a return (as the apostles testify), it is only necessary to turn to Paul's statement, Acts 17:31, "God hath appointed a day in which He will judge" (taking the Scriptural idea of Judge) "the world in righteousness, by that man whom He hath ordained; whereof He hath given assurance unto all men in that he hath raised Him from the dead." The resurrection gives the pledge that that period will most assuredly arrive. The careful student will notice that the credit of being '"the Christ," is dependent upon His having risen from the dead; and hence after the confession of Peter He charged His disciples to tell no man that He was the Christ (joining Mark 9:9, which gave an illustration of the Christship) "till the Son of Man were risen from the dead." But the meaning of "Messiah" or "Christ" is utterly hostile to a purely spiritual reign in heaven; it being the express title of the Theocratic King reigning over the restored Davidic throne and Kingdom. Thus the Jews and early Christians understood it, and such continues its meaning. His exaltation only increases the assurance that he "the Christ" will ultimately be manifested as such in power and great glory. We (1 Thess. 1:10) "wait for His Son from heaven, whom He raised from the dead, even Jesus, which delivered us from the wrath to come."

The language of the apostles is in harmony with the views of the Jews respecting the Messianic Kingdom. The apostles, in their writings, constantly speak of the Kingdom as something that was well understood and fully comprehended as to meaning. Nowhere do we find the modern explanation and definition given to it; and, according to our argument, being covenanted and fully described by the prophets, it needed no such additions, being already clearly apprehended. The apostles were addressing persons to whom the Old Test. was familiar, to whom the covenants and Kingdom were will known; and hence they labored to show that this Jesus was the Messiah, that at His Second Coming the predicted restitution and Kingdom would appear, and that to secure entrance into that kingdom repentance and faith in that Coming Christ were indispensable. the critical student will here find of the chief causes of the early rapid growth of Christianity. Consider the excessive prejudices of the Jewish mind in favor of covenant and prophecy as they pertained to their favourite Messianic expectations, and then how can we reconcile such a sudden revulsion of view and feeling in the many Jewish believers, unless there be, as we have shown, certain points - fundamental -of contact and union? The Messianic idea and fulfillment applied to Jesus at His Second Coming explains the leverage possessed by the apostles, - the truth being enforced through the power and evidences of the Spirit.

-Paraphrased from The Theocratic Kingdom by George.N.H.Peters

Sunday, 5 February 2012

Thy Kingdom Come

Thy kingdom come, thy will be done on earth as it is in heaven - Matthew 6:10

Come, ye blessed of my Father, inherit the kingdom prepared for you from the foundation of the world. - Matthew 25:34

The sovereignty of God is an unfailing encouragement that lights the path of the just and affords assurance to all the faithful, who take great comfort in the words of James in the historic council of the church at Jerusalem: "Known unto God are all his works from the beginning of the world" (Acts 15:18).

God, who has "declared the end from the beginning and from ancient times things not yet done," has said, "My counsel shall stand, and I will do all my pleasure" (Isa. 46:10). He who "works all things after the counsel of his own will" is at work in the world in these momentous times, moving inexorably toward fulfillment of an eternal purpose that antedates creation and gives meaning to human history. History, by divine appointment, is teleological, and the sweep of human events, whatever the sound and the fury, moves toward the appointed end: "Thy kingdom come."

Nothing in the course of events can alter the appointed outcome. The witness of history past, confirming "the prophetic word made more sure" (2 Pet. 1:19), attests that human events ever move toward the inevitable denouement on which creation itself is predicated: the coming of "the kingdom prepared from the foundation of the world."

The kingdom of God, as proclaimed and anticipated by both Jesus and the Apostles an prophets of old, is yet future and awaits its manifestation at the end of the age, to appear in a moment of spectacular divine intervention at the coming of Christ in power and judgment ... but appearing also as the consummation of a long process, as implied by many of our Lord's parables.

All things indeed are possible for God, but only within the limitations of consistency with His own nature and being. We may reverently assume that, for the kind of kingdom He intends, God is following the only possible course: the process of human history.

The process comprehends all that God has done, beginning even before His mighty acts of creation when He "laid the foundations of the earth [and] the morning stars sang together, and all the sons of God shouted for joy" (Job 38:4, 7). it comprehends the creation of angels before earth itself and the origin of sin in the transgression of angels against the will of their Creator. it comprehends the creation of man in the image and likeness of God and the entrance of sin into human experience in the disobedience of man to the word and will of his Creator.

The process comprehends the moral self-discoveries and the redemptive revelations and encounters experiences by the patriarchs of old and all the faithful of their generations. it comprehends the experiences of Abraham, Isaac, Jacob, and a nation descended from them, and the judges and kings and prophets who appeared among them.

The process comprehends the redemptive mission of Jesus, unfolded in His birth, life, ministry, death, resurrection, ascension, and ultimate return in righteous judgment. it comprehends the labors of the Apostles and the witness of the Church to Christ and His saving Gospel in all generations until the coming of the King and the kingdom.

The process whereby God is creating the kingdom which He purposed before the world began comprehends "all nations of men ... on all the face of the earth" 9Acts 17:26) and involves every man. Human history in its totality is the milieu in which the everlasting kingdom is being wrought ... and in which the election determined by God from before creation - an election wholly identified with the kingdom - is being realized.

'Thy kingdom come" - the kingdom which was the concern of Jesus in the days of His flesh, the burden of His preaching, the subject of splendid promises and solemn warnings, and the central theme of all His teaching from the beginning of His ministry to the time of His ascension (Acts 1:3). Thy kingdom come!

And blessed be his glorious name for ever: and let the whole earth be filled with his glory. Amen, and Amen. - Psalm 72:19

- Paraphrased from Elect in the Son by Robert Shank

Wednesday, 1 February 2012

An Argument with God

God, I’ve been in this place already.
For a different task I’m ready.
My hands trail along these familiar walls
And my feet plod wearily these well known halls.
I’ve forgiven this person 70 times 7
Or I’ve stayed up working 24/7
Or I’ve waited for the one I love
Casting the same old prayer to the sky above.
The striving for the goal
The longing of my soul
For the not yet realized dream
For a more triumphant theme.
Why did you bring me here again?
Ready for something new, but when?
It seems to me I’ve already learned this lesson.
And I think it’s about time to move on.
And while I’m asking why,
And while for something else I sigh
You’re building something.
While I’m remembering
and lamenting the past
You’re standing fast.
You know it will not come cheap.
While I lift my impatient gaze to you
Your patient hands rake through
The rubble of my existence
Combing for something of substance
My hands are up in frustration
“Just wait to see what you become,
And in me rest.” You say
But I’m anxious for the day
that I see the result
You see, my default
Is restlessness not rest.
God, you don’t know what’s best.
How could you, when you’ve given me this?
“My child, stop chasing temporary bliss
When I have something more.”
But God I’ve been here before!!!
I’ve done this task, and it’s far too hard
I’ve carried this burden; where’s the reward?
A little farther down the road
Your peace is my abode
Your rest is my home
I longed to roam
When you said stay
Now I see it was better that way.
Forty years of desert sand
Led into a promised land
Despite the weariness of my bone.
The smoothness of the stone
Came from the wearing of wave and sand
From the refiner’s fire, the beautiful, the grand.
“I do not put you through the hard lesson
For the sake of passing the test and moving on.
I’m working in your heart
In the secret, hidden part
Of you, which no one else can see
SO you’ll be more like me
It’s not a lesson to you I am teaching
It’s my very self I am revealing.
I don’t want you to reform
I want you to totally  be reborn.
It’s me you’re coming to know
It’s like feeling the early morning glow
It’s like hearing the music
So you can dance
I want you to drink in abundance
Of my life giving water
It is far better.
So on me wait.
You’ll walk not faint.
You’ll mount up on wing
And your soul will sing.
I declare for you a plan
I had it for you since time began.
Before you were born, I knew you.
In the way no one else does, I know you.
And I will know you in what is to come.”
Yes Lord. I will wait.

-Written by J.S., who I hope would give me permission to use this if they were asked (: I quite like it!